In architecture, superficiality is linked
to more practical factors. With the increasing importance of electronic media,
it is tempting to transform architecture into a giant information display.
Stephen Perrella, who is an architect and theorist, has coined the term
"hypersurface" to name the convergence between cyberspace, envisaged
as hypermedia, and architecture conceived primarily as a surface of projection
or a terminal. Projects like the Signage concept for Digital Media City in
Seoul designed by a MIT team led by Dennis Frenchman have already begun to
explore their possibilities for urban public space. Another set of practical
arguments in favor of surface is linked to energy requirements implied by the
quest for sustainability. Journals of architecture are now filled with projects
and realizations based on skin conditions suposed to drastically improve the behavior
of buildings. The strategic importance of surface also has to do with the
complexity, instability and required flexibility of many contemporary
architectural programs. Due to the complexity, instability and flexibility,
architects are often obliged to limit their pretensions by accepting to produce
a mere envelope. In this situation, the seduction exerted by the envelope
derives from its potential to counterbalance programmatic heterogeneity and
uncertainty. Between philosophical arguments indicative of broad cultural
evolutions and down to earth programmatic constraints, digital architecture's
obsession with surface corresponds also to a series of more specific motives.
The greater degree of arbitrariness that volumes seem imparted with may explain
the spectacular decline of blobs in recent years. After their initial success
and despite their diffusion beyond the circles of digital designers proper,
they no longer epitomize cutting edge research.
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
Sunday, 19 April 2015
W7 Reading
In the 21 century, new strategies for
design and new technology of making materials or large constructions have
emerged, based on biological models of the processes by which natural material
forms are produced. The self organization of biological material systems is a
process that occurs over time, a dynamic that produces the capacity for changes
to the order and structure of a system, and for those changes to modify the
behavior of that system. Natural materials develop under load, and the
intricate interior structure of biological materials is an evolutionary
reponse. At the level of individual, there is also an adaptive response as, for
example, bone tissue gets denser in response to repeated loads in athletic
activities such as weightlifting. In the industrial world, polymer cellular
foams are used for insulation and packaging, but the high structural efficiency
of cellular materials in other, stiffer materials has only begun to be explored
recently. Comparatively few engineers and architects are familiar with the
engineering design of cellular materials, and this has contributed to the slow
development of cellular structures in architecture.
As digital architecture remains in its
infancy, one must be cautious not to draw conclusion about the temporary
features it presents. Far from being jeopardized by the generalization of the
computer and the development of virtual worlds, materiality will probably
remain a fundamental feature of architectural production. One can furthermore
speculate whether the use of the computer, with its web extensions, represents
a substantial departure from the traditional features of architectural
representation. Digital technology are getting familiar in architectural, and
its going to be more and more important in the furture.
W5 Reading
In twentieth
century, machine technology start getting familiar with to the people. As
machine technology was able to produce a mass of goods and services that help
us in normal life. Thomas Edison or other technological enthusiasts wished to
and tried to organize not only technology, but also turned the nontechnological
world mechanistically. During the second industrial revolution in 1880,
inventors and industrial research laboratories carried on invention, research,
development and innovation. Things like telephone, electric light, airplane and
etc got benefit by the electricity and the internal combustion engine, and
followed by the new materials which are steel, aluminum, plastics, and
reinforced concrete, and all these materials helps us in different field
nowadays. Nonetheless subways and underground networks along with tall
buildings gave the cities three dimensions that allowed us to mass in
unprecedented numbers. Technological enthusiasm prevailed in the popular press
during the second industrial revolution much as it does during today’s
information revolution. However, especially in Germany, some intellectuals,
social scientists and historians questioned popular technological enthusiasm
and cast doubts about the social and cultural impact of technology. Oswald
Spengler who is a German historian, associated machine technology with the
decline of Western civilization. He argues that a cultural sea change occurred
when humans began using technology to exploit nature, or in other word, began
to distroy nature. Yet, his arguments are both insightful and irrational. In my
opinion, machine technology brought us a better life, everything we are using
today were produced by machine, may be in 19 century, there were some people
who disagree with this technology, but undeniable, machine technology do bring
us a high technology world.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)